Sister Lucy Truth News
Compiled by Dr. Peter Chojnowski
VIDEO SHOWCASE – 9/18/2023
“The Eye Test“
The “Eye Test” is very simple, is this the same person or two separate people? If these are two separate people then this is the Crime of the Century!
VIDEO SHOWCASE
“Identity Thieves”
A Demonstration from Sister Lucy Truth.
What happens when you overlay the face of the impostor Lucy on top of real Messenger of Fatima?
One of the last known interviews of the True Seer of Fatima, from August 1950. Featuring a running Commentary from Dr. Peter Chojnowski, the director of Sister Lucy Truth. (Sisterlucytruth.com) The interview answers many questions about the Brown Scapular and Our Lady’s requests.
Watch video HERE
Sister Lucia Anatomical Analysis – English Captions https://youtu.be/yFMt-XUfwHI New Forensic Video Here – Important Update – Facial discoveries regarding the Seer of Fatima and the women who replaced her. Professor Carlos Bezerra explains his Forensic art report for Sister Lucy Truth. 
News Item 6/26/2023 Blue Army Spokesman Dismisses a Caller from Kansas City who Mentions the Definitive Evidence Presented by Sister Lucy Truth. The Blue Army, Which I joined as a Child 50 years ago, Now Cannot Think of Any Argument to Refute Our Evidence Other than “Her nephew — WHO IS A PRIEST! —- Would Have Known If It Was Not Her. ” Listen, WHATEVER HE “KNEW,” IT WAS NOT HER. “https://omny.fm/shows/the-drew-mariani-show/chaplet-sr-lucia-named-a-venerable/embed?t=45m40s The gentleman who is being interviewed, who I am told is from the Blue Army, presents only Red Herring arguments concerning the Third Secret controversy and the simple idea that “her nephew — A PRIEST! — would know that it is not her.” Question for the gentleman. If the real Sister Lucy disappeared or was “disappeared” in or around 1959, would her nephew ever have really known the real Sister Lucy? Did he ever know her outside of the Carmelite convent? Did he see her only through the grill and heavily veiled? Was the woman’s conversation “guided” by the other members of her convent when “she’ “met” “her nephew”? Also, if he realized that “Sister Lucy” was not his actual aunt, but an imposter, would he necessarily go public knowing that those at the top of the hierarchy obviously would not want such information to get out. Listen, grown men of reputation, who KNOW that there was an imposter Sister Lucy STILL WILL NOT GO PUBLIC AND ANNOUNCE THEIR JUDGMENTS. Why? Because they know their reputations will be attacked if they should come forward. This includes organizations, like the Blue Army, which has gone along with the Vatican’s manipulation of the Apparitions of Fatima to the Modernist Occupants’ own benefit. And the clueless gentleman who wonders how it would benefit the Modernist Vatican to substitute the true seer of Fatima and Messenger of the Immaculate Heart for a dingbat woman who, when she is not spouting nonsense, is allowing the enemies of Fatima to hijack the persona and message of the actual Seer, to this we can only shake our heads in disbelief. For the “dingbat” aspects of the Imposter Sister Lucy see, https://sisterlucytruth.com/contradictions-2/ 
News Item 6/23/2023
“Canceled Priest” Conference in Chicago Was the Perfect Place to Tell Many About the Most “Canceled” Religious in the History of the Catholic Church — Sister Lucia dos Santos of Fatima. “The Lavender Mafia” Has Been Engaged in Criminality of the Highest Order For A Very Long Time.
The “Canceled Priest” Conference Begins With Speech by “Unplanned” Producer Abby Johnson
Dr. Chojnowski: Due partly to the gracious donation of a supporter of Sister Lucy Truth, I was able to attend the 2nd Annual Conference of “Canceled Priests” held in Chicago on June 23 and 24th. For a conference of this type it seemed to me like a very large gathering, the number that the organizers gave out was 400. This would be very large for such a conference, since I remember that when I was invited to speak at various Fatima Center or Catholic Family News conferences organized by Fr. Nicholas Gruner and John Vennari, everyone was happy to get somewhat over 100 people in attendance.
There were friends of Sister Lucy Truth who asked the organizers of this conference, namely Fr. Lovell, to give me 15 minutes to present the investigation into the substitution of another woman for the authentic seer of Fatima. However, there was no response to our friends’ requests. Even for “Canceled Priests” the idea of the “Lavender Mafia” — the strong words of Fr. James Altman — “bumping off” Sister Lucia of Fatima, and replacing her with another woman of unknown origin, is still too difficult to swallow. Without having a venue to speak, I did my best to inform or remind as many of the attendees as I could about the Catholic “cancelation” of the ages. To my happy surprise, about half of the attendees that I was able to speak with had heard about the Sister Lucy Truth investigation and, of the ones who had heard about it, all excepted the finding that there was indeed an imposter put in the place of the real Sister Lucy dos Santos of Fatima.
With this said, I must say, also that there was a surprising number of people who had never heard about this investigation, even after the extensive coverage we have gotten from LifeSite News — a major supporter of the “Canceled Priest” movement. This clearly needs to be overcome by our media efforts in the future. But what saddened me most with regard to my experience at this gathering was the standoffish indifference to the fact of the substitution of Sister Lucia. Even by many who had heard about it, it was treated as an interesting fact, but not as something of central importance. I will mention that this was the attitude shown by a number of the most prominent of the clergy, lay speakers, and publishers. Is it the case that the scientifically proven FACT of the substitution of the Seer of Fatima and Messenger of the Immaculate Heart of Mary by another woman, who followed along with the plans of the “Lavender Mafia” perfectly from the time she first appeared to the world in 1967 to her death in 2005, is nothing but another one of those “Catholic” curiosities that have often filled our lives over the past decades? It cannot be such, and Sister Lucy Truth, myself, the men and women who do and have done so much work for us, and our supporters, will not allow this to happen.
With this said, during the conference, I was able to make and renew many contacts that will potentially help the cause in the future. Good conversations were had with publishers of Catholic Family News, The Angelus, Fatima Crusader, with producers of LifeSite News, Loreto Press, and various newly-minted lay organizations that are committed to establishing an “underground” Church to provide traditional Masses to communities of laypeople who are realizing that, in order to find or keep the true and traditional Catholic religion, there needs to be a separation from the Novus Ordo hierarchy. Many of these people indicated knowledge of and support for the work of Sister Lucy Truth.
My thoughts on some of the larger issues raised by this conference of “Canceled Priests,” will follow in the next posting. – Dr. Peter Chojnowski, Founder and Director of Sister Lucy Truth.
Part 2 of the Canceled Priest Conference:
Many More Are Seeing the Parallel Between the Emergence of the Imposter Sister Lucia of Fatima and the Emergence of the Modernist “Ape” of the Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church. 
Dr. Chojnowski: It is dawning on many, as last weekend’s “Canceled Priest” conference in Chicago demonstrated, that there is something terribly foreign now occupying the institutional organization of the Catholic Church. Many of the externals look or are spoken of as the same and, yet, it is clear that there is a different “being” there, something that is even completely antagonistic to the being that we expect to be there. One reason for attending and being a presence at the recent conference, was to point out the parallel between the substitution of Sister Lucy dos Santos of Fatima by an imposter and the substitution of the real Catholic Church by an “ape” of the Catholic Church, the Modernist Counterfeit Church of Vatican II. Just as the Catholic Church can be “aped” by those “ecclesial unions” that steal from her many of her externals, so too, the real Sister Lucia was “aped” by a Portuguese woman who put on the same Carmelite habit, appeared in the same kinds of settings, was known by the same name BUT WAS NOT THE SAME PERSON. The individual who wept over the state of apostate humanity was NOT the same person who seemed quite content with the state of the world as it was in her time; always following the “this world affirming” messages of the men who claimed the throne of Holy Peter from 1967 until 2005. The change was dramatic and undeniable and, yet, it was only with the use of modern technology and modern scientific forms of analysis — some cutting edge, like Super Facial Recognition — that we have come to the undeniable judgment that the woman who appeared to the world as “Sister Lucy of Fatima” was not the real one that had actually seen the Miracle of the Sun — no, ASKED FOR A MIRACLE AND WAS GRANTED THE MIRACLE OF THE SUN — but a rather awkward and spiritually obtuse substitute.
I think that the men gathered together to speak about their situation with regard to the long-ago Novus Ordoized dioceses are “looking at the pictures” again, just as we did when it came to the Imposture of Sister Lucy. When we “look at these pictures” again, pictures that we assumed would show us nothing but continuity and regularity, we, instead, see a complete change of spiritual “atmosphere,” an “aura” that is trite and, even, sinister. It is not sinister because of the smiling faces that inevitably are expressed in all posed contemporary photos, but because of the LACK of the reality that IS SUPPOSED TO BE THERE. What if, just say, there was a family photo, of your family, and everyone was smiling, and, yet, there was someone else in the picture that was replacing one of your sons that SHOULD be there. Let’s say he is even smiling, just like everyone else is smiling. Would we not throw down the picture in abject horror and turn away from it knowing that we would never be able to get that eerie image out of our mind? Would we not even begin to weep over the picture that we know is TOTALLY WRONG. But wasn’t the new boy smiling? Was he not even, perhaps, a bit more “presentable” than your own son? Would that mitigate the horror?
As this conference shows, many are beginning to wake up to the horror of the substitution that occurred at Vatican II. Let us critique this awakening surely, but let us encourage it certainly.
News Item- 6/19/2023 – SANPAKU EYES Sanpaku refers to eyes that have more scleral visibility. This can mean that more white is visible above or below the iris. The lower eyelid may sag and display more white due to the natural aging process. In Yin sanpaku (lower scleral show), the sclera portion below the iris is visible. The scleral show is an anatomical condition that can be inherited from your parents, or it may appear later in life as your facial structure changes shape. This condition does not go away with age. Therefore, the real Sister Lucy WITH IT, could not be the older imposter Sister Lucy WITHOUT IT. See PowerPoint presentation – HERE PDF file – Here A video by Professor Carlos Bezerra explaining Sanpaku Eyes – Here – On YouTube Another video by SLT showing Sanpaku Eyes of Lucia the Seer and the absence of the condition in the imposter – Here – On YouTube 
5/31/2023 Message from Dr. Chojnowski – New Forensic Report- New Website! Bones don’t lie! Nor can they be ignored. Sister Lucy Truth has just received a new report from the Brazilian forensic sculptor and historian Professor Carlos Bezerra, which clearly indicates that the totally different facial bone structure of Sister Lucy I (pre-1967) and Sister Lucy II (1967-2005) make it impossible for these individuals to be the same person. Impossible. Not being satisfied with analyzing 2-D pictures alone, Prof. Bezerra created 3-D models, based on the photographs, to more perfectly visualize and display the anatomical differences. The results are amazing and add a 3-D aspect to the pursuit of the truth regarding the fate of Sister Lucia dos Santos, the longest living seer of the Fatima Apparitions. Prof. Bezerra’s forensic report, along with new videos and articles detailing Sister Lucy Truth’s impact around the globe, can be found on our newly launched, up-to-date, more graphic-friendly website at sisterlucytruth.com. Please read the new additions as soon as you can, share the information with others, and be ready for more reports, which are coming soon. Thank you for all your support -Dr. Peter Chojnowski New Forensic Art Report. https://sisterlucytruth.com/carlos-bezerra-forensic-art/ New Website – sisterlucytruth.com 
5/25/2023 Commentary on the Fatima Rosary Prayer in Polish, “Oh my Jesus ” – Komentarz do sprawy modlitwy ,,O mój Jezu” HERE
5/25/2023 Commentary on the Fatima Rosary Prayer in Polish, “Oh my Jesus ” – Komentarz do sprawy modlitwy ,,O mój Jezu” HERE
5/23/23 Another new film based on a talk given by Dr. Chojnowski. HERE The Miracle of the Sun by Peter Chojnowski, Ph.D. The Witnesses Speak! This is an excerpt from the talk given by Dr. Chojnowski at The Fatima Challenge Conference about the Miracle of the Sun that took place at Fatima on October 13, 1917. As Catholics who value and understand the validity of reason and evidence, we must ask ourselves: What lends credibility to this Miracle of the Sun? When we ask this question and begin to do the research, we are amazed at how much evidence there is to support the validity of the claims of this miracle. There are so many contemporary testimonies. I can mention only some of the basic sources which testify to the truth of this miracle. The contemporary press is the first of these sources. Indeed, it was the anti-clerical Masonic press in Portugal which reported on the Miracle first. A link to the Fatima talk in Polish HERE 
New video 5-4-2023 Fatima Crime Updates HERE
Forensic Investigator and Artist Professor Carlos Bezerra demonstrates in 3D that the False Sister Lucy does not qualify as a Conspiracy. Here 
We begin our Guest Writers Page with a Post from Arkadiusz Niewolski on the Profound Impact that the Sister Lucy Truth Investigation has had and MUST HAVE on Poland. https://sisterlucytruth.com/guest-writers/
This account comes from Mark Fellows, Fatima in Twilight (Niagara Falls: Marmion Publications, 2003), pp. 48-49.
“Lucy had been transferred to the Dorothean novitiate at Tuy, a town on the northernmost border of Portugal and Spain in 1926. Two years later she made her first vows. The following summer, Thursday, June 13, 1929…Lucy was observing a holy hour in the chapel. Sometime between 11pm and midnight she knelt prostrate by the communion rails [think here of how the Fake Sister Lucy received communion from John Paul II at Fatima in 2000), and repeated the prayers the Angel of Peace taught her. Lucia recalls: ‘Suddenly the whole chapel was illumined by a supernatural light, and above the altar appeared a cross of light, leading to the ceiling. In a brighter light on the upper part of the cross, could be seen the face of a man and His body as far as the waist. Upon His breast was a dove of light. Nailed to the cross the body of another man. A little below the waist I could see a Chalice and a large Host suspended in the air, onto which drops of Blood were falling from the face of Jesus crucified and from the wound in His side. These drops ran down onto the Host and fell into the Chalice. Beneath the right arm of the cross was Our Lady, and in Her hand was Her Immaculate Heart. It was Our Lady of Fatima, with Her Immaculate Heart in Her left hand, without sword or roses, but with a crown of thorns and flames [in other words, “her” Heart was in perfect union with His Heart — as if it had one single identity]. Under the left arm of the cross, large letters, as if of crystal clear water which ran down upon the altar, formed these words: Grace and Mercy.’
Lucy beheld the vision in silence, ‘I understood that it was the mystery of the Most Holy Trinity that was shown to me and I received lights about this mystery,’ she said later, ‘which I am not permitted to reveal [Can you imagine what those would be!].’ According to Lucy, the Blessed Virgin said, ‘The moment has come in which God asks the Holy Father [at the time Pope Pius XI], in union with all the bishops of the world, to make the consecration of Russia to My Immaculate Heart, promising to save it by this means. There are many souls whom the Justice of God condemns for sins committed against Me, that I have come to ask reparation: sacrifice yourself for this intention and pray.'”
Dr. Chojnowski: So this is an important day in the history of the Fatima Message and in the life of Sister Lucia dos Santos. Not only is she graced with a profoundly theological vision, which affirms all of the central tenets of the Catholic Faith and Religion, but the promise made to her on July 13, 1917 at Fatima, that She would return to ask for the Consecration of Russia, is fulfilled as promised. Just like her promise of the Miracle was fulfilled, at exactly the right time, on October 13, 1917. Pope Pius XI, most probably because he wanted to make a political and diplomatic arrangement with Soviet Russia through the Vatican’s mediator the Third French Republic, the request, although delivered, was NEVER, accomplished. Remember, in this apparition it was requested 1) that the Pope consecrated Russia, that 2) he do this with all of the Catholic bishops of the world, and 3) that following this act the First Saturdays would be proclaimed by the Pope as the means to repair the insult and offense given to the Blessed Virgin Mary, through rejection or neglect of the doctrines about her unique and greatest titles and characteristics that make her “blessed amongst all women.”
Obviously the Trinitarian, Eucharistic, and Marian Apparition at Tuy on June 13, 1929, was meant to unite the messages and the miracle given at Fatima to the most fundamental truths of the Catholic Faith. Where in here do you find the conversion to liberal democracy spoken of by the Imposter Sister Lucy during her interview with Carlos Evaristo in 1993? Where do you find the ecumenical apostasy concerning the nature of God and the way to salvation as this was promoted by the man, John Paul II, who was nearly worshipped by the Imposter Sister Lucy and who, conveniently made himself the topic of the Third Secret.
The real woman, who had miraculously seen portrayed the most profound and fundamental truths of the real Catholic faith, had to be really eliminated by those who wanted these politically and theologically incorrect teachings and realities to disappear from man’s mental horizons. Remember, also, how Cardinal Ratzinger tried to say that this vision was just Sister Lucy taking images and ideas from pious books of devotion. Face it, the real Fatima had to be gotten rid of and replaced with a fraud that fit perfectly with the apostasy of the Modernists who took over the Vatican. Why is this hard?
NEWS ITEM – There was only ONE Imposter Sister Lucy from her first appearance in 1967 to her death in 2005. Read the Report from Lois Gibson, a Guinness Book of World Records Forensic Artist. Here is OUR evidence, even though we have a lot more. Where is the scientific evidence from those who say there were a number of fake Sister Lucys? Lois Gibson’s report here 
Did Our Lady Predict, in 1920, the Constant Persecution and Final Demise of Sister Lucy of Fatima? It appears so. See article HERE Dr. Chojnowski: Here is a basic chronological description of the life of Lucy dos Santos up until her sudden disappearance sometimes between 1957 and 1967. I would like to put special emphasis — as I did with my bolding of the text and capitalization — on the Prophecy that Our Lady made to Jacinta immediately before her death concerning her cousin Lucy. For all of the below, we follow the account given in the excellent text by Mark Fellows, Fatima in Twilight (Niagara Falls, Ontario: Marmion Publications, 2003). 
The “Official” Image: A Perfect Representation of Deception: The Fraud was Intentional and Professional From the Beginning. All with “Ecclesiastical Authority”!
The “Official” Image: A Devious Gift That Keeps Giving
Sister Lucy Truth exclusively broke the reality that one of the most widely circulated, “officially” approved photographs of “Sister Lucy” and Paul VI in 1967 is, in fact, a fraud. This “Official” image is below:
INSERT: 1 – Official Image Lucia and Paul VI
We proved that this “Official” image could be traced all the way back to a June 13, 1967 publication of Voz De Fatima, the official mouthpiece of the Shrine of Fatima, thus refuting any argument that the image emanated from some “unofficial” source years later.
However, it is important to now focus in on precisely the level of deception at work with this Official image. Indeed, as we will prove below, this is not the case where a picture of “Lucia” was innocently cut out and placed next to Paul VI in collage fashion. No, it wasn’t that simple. The level of intent is far more calculating. As conclusively demonstrated below, the source image of the “Lucia” depicted in the “Official” photo was itself manipulated. Specifically, the eyes and a portion of the face were altered to fit the narrative. We will explain. First, it is critical to realize that what we will call the “Source” image used for the “Lucia” portion of the “Official” photo is the image below:
INSERT: 2 – Source Image Lucia Young- 1967
The problem with this photograph, however, is that the woman’s body is facing the wrong direction relative to the position necessary to render a believable Official image. Indeed, her body is facing left even though her eyes are looking right. To be used in the Official image, the woman in this Source photo would need to appear as though both her eyes and body were pointed out toward the cheering crowds at Fatima next to Paul VI. Simple fix, just flip the image, right? Wrong.
INSERT: 3 – Source Image Lucia Young Reversed
When the image is flipped (for a mirror image), the woman’s body now faces the “correct” direction—perfectly consistent with the “Official” image—but, problematically, the woman’s eyes now gaze the “wrong” way. How can this be corrected?
The only option is to manipulate the eyes so they too face the correct direction. Precisely how these eyes were manipulated—or even whose eye(s) were used—for the Official image is unknown. Could one of the eyes actually be from the real Lucia? What is known is that the position of the eyes on the Official image is impossible because they gaze in the same direction as the body faces when we know that in the Source image the body faces one direction and the eyes look in the opposite direction. In analyzing how the eyes were specifically manipulated, two interesting items have emerged.
FIRST ANOMALY: The “Miracle” of the Eyebrow
In the Official image, “Sister Lucia’s” left eyebrow is unnaturally floating off of her face. This physical “miracle” will undoubtedly be cited in her forthcoming canonization along with her amazing ability to bi-locate (tri-locate?) as documented elsewhere on this site. This anomaly is difficult to detect with the naked eye on the Official image but it is apparent upon close forensic image analysis. Below are several important images: (i) a close up of the Official image, (ii) a close up of the face with the colors inverted (ala a negative image), and (iii) a magnified view of the face using publicly available forensic photo software. Anyone reading this article can download the Official image and view these anomalies for themselves:
The floating eyebrow is apparent even to the naked eye upon close inspection.
INSERT: 4 – Close Up Official Lucia Eyebrow
If the Official image is posted into a free photo editing software such as paint.net and Control+Shift+I is pressed, the following image emerges.
INSERT: 5 – Official Image Lucia Young_Inverted Color
Below is the face of “Lucia” from the Official image magnified using free forensic software, Forensically.
INSERT: 6 – Official Image Lucia Magnified
SECOND ANOMALY: Deliberately Aged Face and Protruding Eyelid
It is evident the Source image was intentionally manipulated to make the individual appear older. This can be most clearly observed by comparing the right eye of the Source image with the right eye of the Lucia depicted on the cover of a book published in 1975, Lucie Raconte Fatima. A comparison reveals that the image was added to or otherwise altered below her right eye because (a) there is a clear, unmistakable, unnatural protrusion of the lower right eyelid up into the eye, and (b) the crease below the right eye in the Official image with Paul VI and the Lucie Raconte Fatima image is nonexistent in the Source photo. It is unclear whether the unnatural protrusion of the lower lid is evident in the “Official” image, but the eyes of that image had to undergo further manipulation to obtain the “correct” position as mentioned, above.
Lucie Raconte Fatima, 1975
INSERT: 7 – Lucie Raconte Fatima cover
Again, here is the Source image.
INSERT: 8 – Source Image Lucia close up
Close up of the Lucie Raconte Fatima cover photo
INSERT: 9 – Lucie Raconte Fatima close up_1
Below is another image of the Lucie Raconte Fatima book cover with a different resolution
INSERT: 10 – Lucie Raconte Fatima close up_2
Anomalies to the crease and lower eyelid clearly evident.
INSERT: 11 – Lucie Raconte Fatima close up_3
Conclusion. The Official image is more than a cut and paste job. It represents specific, intentional manipulation to present the perfect image to fit a convenient narrative. Indeed, one official publication with “Ecclesiastical Approval”— Documents on Fatima & the Memoirs of Sister Lucia, pg. 79—ironically captioned the Official image with a curious quote from Bishop John Venancio (pictured to Paul VI’s right on the Official image). Venancio commented on the meaning of the Official image as follows: “This gesture of the Pope indicated, ‘What Sister Lucia stands for, I stand behind.’”
Since we know with certainty that the “Lucia” in the Official image was a carefully manipulated fraud, it appears Bishop Venancio’s words were truer than anyone realized: what Paul VI actually stood behind was an intentional deception.
anúncio -12/30/22-denunciantes portugueses procurados por favor me ajude Irmã Lúcia dos Santos
entre em contato com sisterlucytruth.org/contact entre em contato com justicepc@yahoo.com
Montini and the Mimic – From SLT FILMS This film has English dialog – HERE To watch with Portuguese subtitles for our friends in Portugal, Brazil and around the world go HERE
News Item – World-Class Handwriting Analyst Demonstrates that the Writings of “Sister Lucy” from after 1957 were Forgeries. Analysis of “Third Secret” Released by Vatican in 2000, Forged 1969 Letter Urging Obedience and Submission to Paul VI, Signatures on Letters from 1967 and 1969, Letter about Consecration of Russia From 1980, and Manuscript Released by Carmelites of Coimbra and Used as the Basis for Sister Lucy’s Official Biography Published by the Blue Army WERE ALL FORGERIES. Follow the Links to the Sworn Testimony Below.
New and Revised Analysis Comparing Known and Excepted Handwriting Samples form Sister Lucy to the Letter Written in November of 1969, in which complete obedience to Paul VI’s revolutionary actions in the Church is urged. Analyst certifies that the “Third Secret” (written in 1944) released by the Vatican IS consistent with the known Sister Lucy’s handwritings, leaving open the possibility of a “Fourth Secret.”
Sworn testimony and analysis of “Manuscript of Sister Lucy” which served as the basis, put forward as authentic by the Carmelites of Coimbra, for Sister Lucy’s official biography. This cleverly done forgery was published by the Blue Army.
Scroll Down to Report #2
Signatures of Sister Lucy from the 1940s compared to those of documents in 1967 and 1969. Clever forgeries indicating that the Real Sister Lucy was gone from the scene by these years.
Scroll Down To Report #3
Current and completed Facial Recognition Reports, Forensic Artist’s Report, Plastic Surgeon’s Report, Handwriting Analysts report, and Orthodontist Report can Be located at:
Contributions to the Sister Lucy Truth fund for further research and investigations, can be made at:
Interview with Fr. Paul Kramer – Besides the proven forgeries, Fr. Paul Kramer stated that when he met and spoke with real sister Lucia’s older sister Carolina, she said that her sister never used a typewriter or computer but always wrote in longhand. – Listen HERE
Fr. Paul Kramer- “She told me another interesting fact. She said that whenever she would visit her sister Lucia, she was not allowed to speak with her privately.” “She would sit with the other sisters at a distance so she couldn’t see close up who was this person.“ 
Does Sister Lucy Truth have any Idea where the Imposter Sister Lucy is from? From the Reports of three Linguistic Analysts, the Imposter’s accent places her someplace in or near Viseu, Portugal, 100 miles north of Fatima.
Read the reports below that detail both an accent from an area far north of Fatima, but also, bizarre conversation coming from the Imposter Sister Lucy, which could not, by any stretch of the imagination, come from the real Sister Lucy dos Santos, only surviving seer of Fatima. If anyone in Viseu knows who this woman is, please let us know at justicepc@yahoo.com
If there are any Producers/Directors interested in this project please contact Dr. Peter Chojnowski at: justicepc@yahoo.com Click image below to view the trailer. 
News Item – According to this forensic math/facial recognition report prepared by Dr. Robert J. Bennett the chances of Lucy I being Lucy II are one in 13 million! See video – HERE Forensic Math Report – HERE (Robert J. Bennett, Ph.D., holds a doctorate in General Relativity from Stevens Institute of Technology. He served as a physics instructor at Manhattan College and Bergen Community College from 1967-1983, and is presently doing private tutoring in physics and mathematics. He has served as a consultant for the entire Galileo Was Wrong: The Church Was Right project.) 
News Item – Another Priest from the U.S. and two Nuns from Fatima acknowledge the Imposter Lucy – Here 
Here is a complete video presentation of our first, and so far only, in-person presentation of the results of the Sister Lucy Truth investigation that began in 2017 and continues to this very day. After listening to this and viewing all of our so-far-published information at sisterlucytruth.org, please tell us if we have not at least shown you that there is need for an investigation into the case of Sister Lucy dos Santos, the famous Seer of Fatima. As was even clear 3 years ago, but has become clearer over the past months, when we are dealing with the case of Sister Lucy dos Santos, the actual seer of Fatima, who predicted and witnessed the Miracle of the Sun on October 13, 1917, we find that we are clearly and undeniably dealing with a case of stolen identity that could be the result of murder, kidnapping, or illicit confinement. The overwhelming evidence backing up that assertion, plus the total lack of real scientific evidence that would argue the contrary, has been presented by Sister Lucy Truth in the public forum, accessible on-line at sisterlucytruth.org. Based upon the findings present in these reports we have found that there was an imposter substituted for the real Sister Lucy of Fatima at least by the date of May 13, 1967 when the Imposter appeared along side Paul VI when the latter was making an obligatory trip to Fatima to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the first apparition. The woman that appeared on that day has been scientifically identified as the same woman that appeared as “Sister Lucy” in 1982 when John Paul II, after the assassination attempt against him on May 13, 1981, “visited” “Sister Lucy” in his attempt to associate his recovery with the Fatima Apparitions and, seemingly, to prepare the ground for the claim that the Third Secret, given in 1917 was actually about the assassination attempt against him in 1981, even though, according to Sister Lucy, the Secret was supposed to be released by 1960 because by that year, the content of the Secret would be “clearer.” In light of the scientific findings in this case, we at Sister Lucy Truth assert that this first visit to the Imposter in 1982 was the first stage of an attempt to hijack the Third Secret for John Paul II’s own Neo-Modernist ends. Suddenly, by 2000 HE WAS THE HERO AND MEANING OF THE THIRD SECRET. We are convinced that this could only have happened if there was an imposter which long before had taken the place of Sister Lucy of Fatima. Now Sister Lucy Truth moves its investigation on to answering the questions, why it was done, how it was done, when it was done, who did it, and who was the substitute put in the place of the real Sister Lucy of Fatima. We will also seek the DNA proof that will render our case irrefutable. -Dr. Peter Chojnowski Please support us by donating at sisterlucytruth.org/donate 
Those who dismiss the forensic reports, (over a dozen), usually come back with this objection. VIDEO – HERE Objection #10. Wouldn’t Sr. Lucy’s family or relatives or the nuns of her convent have known that she was an imposter? Firstly, we don’t know what Sr. Lucy’s family, relatives, or nuns “knew” about her, and barring the revelation of some unknown confession, we may never know. However, there are some truths we do know. The scientific and medical evidence we have is irrefutable. All the logistical difficulties of how an imposter could be introduced are secondary details that remain to be discovered. However, we know that the relatives were never allowed to see Sr. Lucy face-to-face but always behind the grille and in the presence of other sisters of the community. Hence there was no opportunity for intimate or in-depth conversation. If it is true that the Church replaced Sr. Lucy with an imposter, if it is possible that the Church was overrun by Communists and Freemasons, is it not also reasonable to believe that these thugs acting in the name of the Church exerted pressure on Sr. Lucy’s relatives to remain silent and pretend as if nothing were happening? This isn’t proof that there was an imposter. It is simply stating that we should not be surprised that a cover up would involve tying up the loose ends with whatever threats or means necessary.
Sister Lucy Truth: The Fraud of the Centuries Uncovered
In 2017, a little known academic, Dr. Peter Chojnowski, after spending several years puzzling over the dissimilarity between photos of the early Sister Lucy and the Sister Lucy of 1967 and beyond, founded Sister Lucy Truth, an organization dedicated to a complete identification of Sister Lucy of Fatima. This project is a scientific attempt to determine whether there was a substitute who replaced a murdered or “disappeared” Sister Lucy of Fatima. After over 3 years of submitting all of the relevant photographic, video, and handwriting evidence to experts at the top of their professions, the conclusion has been a decisive one: SISTER LUCY II (1967-2005) IS AN IMPOSTER. The religious fraud of the centuries is now glaring in the face of an unknowing world. The facts point to one conclusion:
Sister Lucy of Fatima, the Seer of the Virgin, was eliminated after 1958 and another woman was put in her place to act from then on as “Sister Lucy of Fatima.” Who were the dark forces that brought this crime about? Who will investigate what happened to the real Sister Lucy? Who was this woman who was put in her place? What were the intrigues in Church and State which required that Sister Lucy dos Santos, the Sole Surviving Seer of the Apparitions of Fatima, DISAPPEAR FOREVER AND BE REPLACED BY ONE WHO WOULD NOT INTERFERE WITH THE AGENDA OF THE HIGHEST OFFICIALS IN THE VATICAN.
This calls for a movie to break the story to a world that will soon, in the cinema, hear about the Story of Fatima again. It is, however, a story more fascinating and terrifying than anyone could ever have guessed. Contact Dr. Chojnowski here: justicepc@yahoo.com
The most wide spread interview so far with Dr. Peter Chojnowski. From the Life SITE Blog by John-Henry Westen – HERE Professor uncovers evidence exposing fake Sr. Lucy of Fatima On this episode of The John-Henry Westen Show, Dr. Peter Chojnowski explains how forensic analysis and anecdotal evidence show that an imposter Sister Lucia dos Santos replaced the original Fatima seer. 
Interviews – Dr. Chojnowski is available for interviews – Please contact here: justicepc@yahoo.com or here sisterlucytruth.org/contact/ The Impostor’s Fake Prophecy of 2008 – Video HERE From Dr. Chojnowski – Any message from “Sister Lucy” after December 26, 1957 is fraudulent since we have scientifically and mathematically proven that the woman who appeared as “Sister Lucia of Fatima” was an imposter. We still assume that such a minor point matters! The central issues are not “family,” vaguely defined. Indeed, the family is only collapsing into meaninglessness and perversion BECAUSE Catholic doctrine was “changed” due to Vatican II and these errors were spread by the “hierarchy” that came out of that 60s era. The central battles between God and Lucifer have to do with: the very objectivity of truth, the very idea that the mind is meant to conform to the created order, the existence of sanctifying grace that raises the human soul to the supernatural level of the divine life; the validity of the sacraments of the Catholic Church, the validity of the Mass which is the chief source of grace to the world, the validity of the Orders of the Church that are the necessary conduits of sanctifying grace, the identity of the Catholic Church as the ONLY vessel of salvation for the world, the fact that it is due to the possession of sanctifying grace in our soul that we are able to avoid the fires of Hell for all eternity. Besides the proven forgeries, Fr. Paul Kramer stated that when he met and spoke with real sister Lucia’s older sister Carolina, she said that her sister never used a typewriter or computer but always wrote in longhand. – Listen HERE Image below shows the Impostor using a typewriter. Handwriting analysis HERE 
Forensic Artist and Sculptor Carlos Bezerra collaborates with SLT on this project. – HERE Com a colaboração do site Sister Lucy Truth divulgamos o relatório da perita forense Lois Gibson. Aumentam as evidências científicas da fraude. 
The Global Reach of the Fatima Investigation and SLT is increasing. – New video from Brazil – HERE 
New Polish Article – Wywiady z fałszywą s. Łucją – analiza sprzeczności – HERE Video – “Justice for Sister Lucy” For our Italian speaking friends around the world. – HERE What are the 1992-1993 interviews? – HERE
SLT video “Contradictions” – HERE
Added today – 12/16/2022 – The John-Henry Westen interview with Dr. Chojnowski Podcast. Listen to the program HERE
Fatima Fraud – Most questions asked of SLT and the Fatima Investigation are answered HERE
One of the most asked question is answered here by Dr. Chojnowski.
From the document, Fatima Fraud: Our Case for an Impostor Sister Lucy – P.29 Q) Wouldn’t Sr. Lucy’s family or relatives or the nuns of her convent have known that she was an impostor? A) Firstly, we don’t know what Sr. Lucy’s family, relatives, or nuns “knew” about her, and barring the revelation of some unknown confession, we may never know. However, there are some truths we do know. The scientific and medical evidence we have is irrefutable. All the logistical difficulties of how an impostor could be introduced are secondary details that remain to be discovered. However, we know that the relatives were never allowed to see Sr. Lucy face-to-face but always behind the grille and in the presence of other sisters of the community. Hence there was no opportunity for intimate or in-depth conversation. If it is true that the Church replaced Sr. Lucy with an impostor, if it is possible that the Church was overrun by Communists and Freemasons, is it not also reasonable to believe that these thugs acting in the name of the Church exerted pressure on Sr. Lucy’s relatives to remain silent and pretend as if nothing were happening? This isn’t proof that there was an impostor. It is simply stating that we should not be surprised that a cover up would involve tying up the loose ends with whatever threats or means necessary. -END Please print or pass on this PDF to all those who have questions. Also, all the forensic report are compiled HERE
News Item –12/11/2022- Fr. David Hewko SSPX-MC preaches about the Imposter Sister Lucy. He also says that
through his contacts in Coimbra, he has heard that the “word on the street” is that Sister Lucy was eliminated in 1965 and an Imposter put in her place. – HERE Interview -12/5/2022 Lifesite News – NEW Forensic Files expose FAKE Sr. Lucy of Fatima? HERE Listen to the program on the LifesiteNews Podcast HERE
Interview – 12/3/2022 – Dr. Chojnowski is interviewed by ‘Return to Tradition’ – HERE
Full interview – HERE
News Item – It’s not a TOTAL news blackout!
Who are the Catholic media personalities that have gone on record stating there was an Impostor Lucy? – HERE
What is Fatima? An overview – HERE
The link is from our media site sisterlucyfilm.com
Announcement- New Polish section. – Videos and Polish website – HERE
Our latest film project – Forensic Art from Professor Bezerra of Brazil – HERE
Fide Post– French Website interviewed Dr. Chojnowski last year. – HERE
Fide Post Article – Their verdict is final: the “Sister Lucia” who was put forward from the end of the 1960s by the conciliar authorities is
quite simply not the same person as the real Sister Lucia Dos Santos, the little seer of Fatima, who became a Carmelite nun in Coimbra, Portugal. – HERE
Announcement – Visit the SLT YouTube channel – HERE
Announcement from Dr. Chojnowski– Sister Lucy Truth reaches out to the world with our website’s new capability of having our site translated into 104 different languages. This includes a translation for all of the reports and all of the published statements of Sister Lucy Truth. No one can now claim ignorance as to the facts of the substitution of Sister Lucy dos Santos, Seer of Fatima. Benedict XVI can now read our website in German, Italian, and even Latin! No excuses. The time for invincible ignorance is definitely over!
Announcement from Sister Lucy Truth concerning the “Consecration of Russia” planned by Francis I on March 25, 2022:
It is not the mission of Sister Lucy Truth to make a judgment on the Consecration of Russia as was asked for in 1917 and 1929. Our mission is to investigate the life and identity of Sister Lucy dos Santos of Fatima. This mission has been expanded now that we have conclusive proof that the woman who appeared with Paul VI on May 13, 1967 was not actually Sister Lucy of Fatima, but an imposter. This proof has caused us to widen our investigation into an attempt to investigate the disappearance of the real Sister Lucy herself and the identity of the imposter.
Vatican’s statement about the “Consecration of Russia” is an Implicit Official Recognition that the woman who claimed that “The Consecration was done,” was an imposter and liar. This is as close as the Vatican has come to recognizing the truth of what Sister Lucy Truth has found.
